These opinions break new ground in defining the meaning of direct adversity. As the opinions themselves demonstrate, however, attorneys are well advised to avoid reading too much into the opinions. Neither opinion provides carte blanche to do whatever the attorney wishes, however the attorney wishes to do it. And in Opinion 05-434, in particular, it is likely that in a great many of the actual circumstances in which a lawyer represents both a testator and a beneficiary, a conflict will exist. If nothing else, however, these opinions should promote a thoughtful analysis of the reasons why current client conflicts should or should not be said to exist.